The Fight For Democracy in Vietnam

 In the politically active sections of the Vietnamese diaspora, there are often calls for “democracy” to be instituted in Vietnam. From Phạm Đoan Trang to the Viet Tan, many organizations proclaim “democracy” to be of the utmost necessity. And while it is true that Vietnam is not a democratic country, the “solutions” proposed by the above mentioned figures would not change anything.


The Viet Tan, also known as the The Reform Revolutionary Party of Vietnam, has a clear cut program and is popular with the bourgeoisie, so we shall use them as an example. Their program states they want a multi-party democracy. Specifically:


“Viet Tan holds that any political party, or individual, whether or not in power, may still contribute to the betterment of the nation and people through the activities and avenues of civil society.”


An interesting choice of policy. But it gets better (and by better we mean worse). On the subject of class struggle they say:


“Class struggle, the root cause of societal divisions, hatred among fellow countrymen, as well as all other forms of discrimination must cease. No individual or group of people may invoke any pretext to stand above everyone else.”


What drivel! Why do they think these are solutions? Well, luckily they are clear about this. They say:


“The dictatorial communist regime has been the cause of many national crises including widespread government corruption, wasting of national resources, and environmental destruction.”


Blatant misuse of the word “communist” aside, the Viet Tan fails to acknowledge that a multi-party state is also capable of being corrupt, wasting national resources, and destroying the environment. The United Kingdom, for example, checks all of those boxes. And yet they are a democracy with more parties than there are colors in the rainbow. The United States is at fault as well, despite being a multi-party democracy (even though their “corruption” is often whitewashed and ignored).


Principled communists will know that the root of these issues does not lie in lack of parties, but rather in capitalism. Capitalists would commit the most heinous of atrocities, and indeed they have, so long as it generated profit. And this holds true for Vietnam as well.


So far the democracy proposed has been bourgeois democracy. The real solution lies in proletarian democracy. What is proletarian democracy? Simply put, it is a democratic system created and based on the class of the proletariat. Modern democracy as we know it has been created and based on the class of the bourgeoisie. That is why we call it a bourgeois democracy, because it is a democracy built for the advancement, fulfillment, and benefit of the bourgeoisie.

The quintessential body of proletarian democracy is the workers council. Workers councils manifest the economic and political power of the working class. They create an authentically democratic and representative Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Here not a dictatorship in the sense of power being centred around an individual but around the whole of the masses, working towards their own goals, dictating their own future, which is a stepping stone to Communism. Unlike bourgeois Parliaments or Congresses, delegates for workers councils are given an imperative mandate by those they represent, a duty to follow which is the decision of the conscious proletariat. Should they fail their workers, they can be instantly recalled from duty, and replaced.


Below we will link three brief works, one from the Internationalist Communist Tendency, one by Anton Pannekoek and the other by Sylvia Pankhurst, which go into more detail concerning proletarian democracy. We highly recommend you read them to gain further insight.


If the Vietmamese proletariat truly want Communism, then they must implement a system of workers councils. However, this effort cannot be reduced to only Vietnam and done only through reform. The bourgeois state will only allow minimal changes, and is made to protect itself. A revolution on an international scale must break out to implement this system, so as to crush the international bourgeoisie and their running dogs! And thus, we are for a proletarian revolution in Vietnam, for an international revolution against the bourgeois exploiters, and for the establishment of proletarian democracy!


Additional Reading

http://www.leftcom.org/en/articles/2020-10-02/their-democracy-and-ours

https://www.marxists.org/archive/pannekoe/1936/councils.htm

http://libcom.org/library/constitution-british-soviets-points-communist-programme-sylvia-pankhurst

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview With A Vietnamese Anarchist

We've recently had the opportunity to interview a Vietnamese Anarchist. Because Vietnam is a police state, we thought it would be best to not ask them too many questions which may be used by the State to incriminate them. Apologies in advance. If you would like to see something specific about Vietnam, please email us. Q: For our readers who are unfamiliar with the philosophy, could you explain what Anarchism is? A: Anarchism is an ideal where the autonomy of the individual is of most importance. Q: What methods of change are preferred by Anarchists? Could there be ballot-box Anarchism? A: Anarchism requires revolution, it's impossible to destroy societal hierarchical classes by submitting yourself to the game of the powerful. Q: And for social organization, how would society look if it was anarchist? A: I think there will be organizations within local communes, which will cooperate together on the basis of mutual assistance and free association. Q: What or who would you say was
Read more

The Bloated Bureaucracy of Vietnam

  Before we dive into the discussion of the bureaucracy which chokes Vietnam like a boa constrictor, it would be useful for us to define “bureaucracy”. Many Communists throw the word around but do not know what it means. We take our definition from Alexandra Kollontai. Writing for the Workers Opposition, she states: “ Bureaucracy is a direct negation of mass self-activity. [...] Restrictions on initiative are imposed, not only in regard to the activity of the non-party masses [...] The initiative of Party members themselves is restricted. Every independent attempt, every new thought that passes through the censorship of our centre, is considered as ‘heresy’, as a violation of Party discipline, as an attempt to infringe on the prerogatives of the centre, which must ‘foresee’ everything and ‘decree’ everything and anything. If anything is not decreed one must wait, for the time will come when the centre at its leisure will decree. Only then, and within sharply restricted limits, will one
Read more

Lessons From Vietnam

  The 1930s-1940s proved to be a period of intense social upheaval and proletarian action in colonial Vietnam. Faced with the Stalinist class-collaborationists of the Viet Minh, and the colonial empire of France, the proletariat in Vietnam tried to forge its own communist path. Proletarian elements grouped around the League of Internationalist Communists tried to push this path along, and help the proletariat realize it’s force as a distinct class. Although the struggle ended in victory for the bourgeoisie, and the League had most of its members liquidated by the Viet Minh, drawing lessons from the period is still crucial. That is what we have set out to do in this piece. The Proletariat as the Revolutionary Class The most immediate lesson one can draw from the period is that the proletariat is the only revolutionary class in the capitalist epoch. It was the industrial and rural parts of the proletariat which formed the embryos of a dictatorship of the proletariat. Notable among these
Read more