Grab Workers Strike in Vietnam

 It is no secret that capital has permeated every level of society in Vietnam. But now the contradictions of capitalism are starting to show once again. And resistance is being made manifest through the strike. Although the resistance is not great, no struggle must be discarded, especially not the one Vietnam is faced with now.


Hundreds of proletarians working for the ride hailing service Grab have gone on strike recently, following a proposal by Grab to institute a new fee plan. Said fee plan would increase the percentage of tips that Grab could take from it’s drivers - the “take rate” - from 20% to 30%. The new plan would also increase the fee for Grab’s car and bike services by 5% to 6%.


The plan, indicative of the bourgeoisie’s tendency to shrink wages, was proposed in response to a new tax plan by the Vietnamese government.


Although those striking are all drivers for Grab, this new plan has naturally angered those who use the service, who will be forced to pay more.[1]


This is not the first time that Grab policy has provoked a strike. In 2018 Grab workers went on strike when the company proposed an increase of the take rate from 20% to 23.6%.[2] In fact that original 20% take rate, instituted in 2017, was an increase from the original 15%. This 15% to 20% increase was likewise met with harsh criticism, though no action.[3] 


Like the strike before it, the likelihood that the strikers here succeed in their goal is high. But the likelihood this evolves to class wide action is low. The struggle has spread to at least Hanoi and Saigon[4], and mobilized hundreds in its efforts. And there is a lack of the presence of trade unions, who could only act as mediators between labor and capital. This characteristic, one of the more important ones, must be preserved throughout the whole struggle, so workers may come to really communist conclusions, and not illusions which delude them into thinking capitalism can be reformed. 


Unfortunately the strike lacks real militancy and a political programme. If this struggle is to really strike at the heart of the problem, the capitalist dictatorship of Vietnam, then it must possess these two characteristics, along with a class unity. Otherwise it will stay a pseudo-reformist campaign.


Although we cannot really say for certain what will come of it. But, success or otherwise, history tells us that it is only a matter of time before the next hike in take rates. But the proletariat can only take so much abuse! Sooner or later, having forged a political programme, and with the burning desires of revolution in their hearts, the proletariat will unite as a class and smash it’s oppressors! Atop their graves shall be made a complete dictatorship of the proletariat!



[1]Grab hit with drivers' strike over higher take rates in Vietnam - Tech in Asia


[2]Drivers Go on Strike to Protest Grab's Increase in Commission Rate to 23.6% - Saigoneer


[3] Grab Vietnam to Increase Commission Rate to 20%, Upsets Drivers - Saigoneer


[4] Bản đồ các cuộc đình công, biểu tình tài xế công nghệ tại Việt Nam / Map of strikes and protests by app-based drivers in Vietnam - Google My Maps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview With A Vietnamese Anarchist

We've recently had the opportunity to interview a Vietnamese Anarchist. Because Vietnam is a police state, we thought it would be best to not ask them too many questions which may be used by the State to incriminate them. Apologies in advance. If you would like to see something specific about Vietnam, please email us. Q: For our readers who are unfamiliar with the philosophy, could you explain what Anarchism is? A: Anarchism is an ideal where the autonomy of the individual is of most importance. Q: What methods of change are preferred by Anarchists? Could there be ballot-box Anarchism? A: Anarchism requires revolution, it's impossible to destroy societal hierarchical classes by submitting yourself to the game of the powerful. Q: And for social organization, how would society look if it was anarchist? A: I think there will be organizations within local communes, which will cooperate together on the basis of mutual assistance and free association. Q: What or who would you say was
Read more

The Bloated Bureaucracy of Vietnam

  Before we dive into the discussion of the bureaucracy which chokes Vietnam like a boa constrictor, it would be useful for us to define “bureaucracy”. Many Communists throw the word around but do not know what it means. We take our definition from Alexandra Kollontai. Writing for the Workers Opposition, she states: “ Bureaucracy is a direct negation of mass self-activity. [...] Restrictions on initiative are imposed, not only in regard to the activity of the non-party masses [...] The initiative of Party members themselves is restricted. Every independent attempt, every new thought that passes through the censorship of our centre, is considered as ‘heresy’, as a violation of Party discipline, as an attempt to infringe on the prerogatives of the centre, which must ‘foresee’ everything and ‘decree’ everything and anything. If anything is not decreed one must wait, for the time will come when the centre at its leisure will decree. Only then, and within sharply restricted limits, will one
Read more

Lessons From Vietnam

  The 1930s-1940s proved to be a period of intense social upheaval and proletarian action in colonial Vietnam. Faced with the Stalinist class-collaborationists of the Viet Minh, and the colonial empire of France, the proletariat in Vietnam tried to forge its own communist path. Proletarian elements grouped around the League of Internationalist Communists tried to push this path along, and help the proletariat realize it’s force as a distinct class. Although the struggle ended in victory for the bourgeoisie, and the League had most of its members liquidated by the Viet Minh, drawing lessons from the period is still crucial. That is what we have set out to do in this piece. The Proletariat as the Revolutionary Class The most immediate lesson one can draw from the period is that the proletariat is the only revolutionary class in the capitalist epoch. It was the industrial and rural parts of the proletariat which formed the embryos of a dictatorship of the proletariat. Notable among these
Read more