Points Of Unity

 The Left-Communist Group of Vietnam is a group founded in the Vietnamese diaspora, and based in the Dutch-German current of Left-Communism. Our positions are as follows:

  • The "Socialist" Republic of Vietnam is not socialist. On the contrary, it is capitalist.
  • Ho Chi Minh Thought, the official ideology of the ruling "Communist" Party of Vietnam, is a bourgeois current.
  • Stalinism, called "Marxism-Leninism" in Vietnam and the forefather of Ho Chi Minh Thought, is likewise a bourgeois current.
  • The Socialist Oriented Market Economy introduced by the "Communist" Party is not socialist, but capitalist.
  • A revolution by the Vietnamese proletariat is necessary to establish a Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
  • An integral organ to the revolution is the workers council, by which the proletariat has direct control over the means of production and can create a proletarian dictatorship.
  • A new revolution cannot fall into the trap of nationalism, which would limit the scope of the revolution and hinder it.
  • A new revolution must aim to abolish all elements of capitalism, including wage labor, commodity production, private ownership of the means of production etc.

Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 28, 2020 at 6:52 PM

    woa based???? (I believe in insurrection, not revolution though) (this comment is from diod doodles by the way, I clicked on the link on your profile B))

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownAugust 24, 2021 at 11:50 AM

    Based

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview With A Vietnamese Anarchist

We've recently had the opportunity to interview a Vietnamese Anarchist. Because Vietnam is a police state, we thought it would be best to not ask them too many questions which may be used by the State to incriminate them. Apologies in advance. If you would like to see something specific about Vietnam, please email us. Q: For our readers who are unfamiliar with the philosophy, could you explain what Anarchism is? A: Anarchism is an ideal where the autonomy of the individual is of most importance. Q: What methods of change are preferred by Anarchists? Could there be ballot-box Anarchism? A: Anarchism requires revolution, it's impossible to destroy societal hierarchical classes by submitting yourself to the game of the powerful. Q: And for social organization, how would society look if it was anarchist? A: I think there will be organizations within local communes, which will cooperate together on the basis of mutual assistance and free association. Q: What or who would you say was
Read more

Thesis on the Vietnamese Revolution

  There is a common tendency on the Left of Capital to either critically or uncritically support “socialist” states. While the usual targets of this support usually include Cuba and China, many likewise support the “Socialist” Republic of Vietnam. However, just like the two aforementioned countries, there is nothing socialist about Vietnam. In fact, it is capitalist. And it’s capitalist and bourgeois characteristics were visible from the very onset of its revolution. From Marx, we know that the history of humanity is the history of class warfare, and that each society humans pass through is a class society. We go from primitive communism, to slave society, to feudalism, to capitalism, and now we must go to communism. Likewise, this was the case in Vietnam. However, uneven development meant that Vietnam was still in the feudal stage of society prior to colonization by the French. French colonization did eventually develop capitalism in Vietnam. The proletariat and bourgeoisie materializ
Read more

The Bloated Bureaucracy of Vietnam

  Before we dive into the discussion of the bureaucracy which chokes Vietnam like a boa constrictor, it would be useful for us to define “bureaucracy”. Many Communists throw the word around but do not know what it means. We take our definition from Alexandra Kollontai. Writing for the Workers Opposition, she states: “ Bureaucracy is a direct negation of mass self-activity. [...] Restrictions on initiative are imposed, not only in regard to the activity of the non-party masses [...] The initiative of Party members themselves is restricted. Every independent attempt, every new thought that passes through the censorship of our centre, is considered as ‘heresy’, as a violation of Party discipline, as an attempt to infringe on the prerogatives of the centre, which must ‘foresee’ everything and ‘decree’ everything and anything. If anything is not decreed one must wait, for the time will come when the centre at its leisure will decree. Only then, and within sharply restricted limits, will one
Read more